Britbike forum

Classic British SparesKlempf British PartsBaxter CycleThe Bonneville ShopLowbrow CustomsGirling Classic MotorcycleLucas Classic MotorcycleHepolite PistonsIndustrial tec supplyJob Cycle

Upgrade your membership to Premium Membership or Gold Membership or Benefactor or Vendor Membership


New Sponsor post
Sale and Freebies May 2nd to 9th
by BritCycleSupply - 05/05/23 4:15 pm
New FAQ post
Three issues to look into
by Magnetoman - 05/24/23 1:45 pm
News & Announcements
Premium members! 🌟
by Morgan aka admin - 05/25/23 10:30 am
Gold members! ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️
by Morgan aka admin - 05/16/23 2:10 pm
How to guides - Technical articles
Removing Triumph sludge tube
by reverb - 05/08/23 7:30 pm
Sixth edition is now out:
The Gold Star Buyer's Companion
ShoutChat
Comment Guidelines: Do post respectful and insightful comments. Don't flame, hate, spam.
Member Spotlight
ChadB
ChadB
NC
Posts: 95
Joined: May 2005
Top Posters(30 Days)
Lannis 90
DavidP 80
Allan G 66
Top Likes Received (30 Days)
Lannis 44
Cyborg 23
raf940 22
Newest Members
Michael Pelkey, Myrt, Tim Chandler, Magn0208, tsmeds100
12,520 Registered Users
Forum Statistics
Forums35
Topics77,075
Posts792,716
Members12,520
Most Online230
Mar 11th, 2023
Photo posting tutorial

Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
#902816 02/14/23 5:54 am
Joined: Mar 2019
Posts: 9
Likes: 1
Britbike forum member
OP Offline
Britbike forum member
Joined: Mar 2019
Posts: 9
Likes: 1
Interested in the weight of a late A65 1971-72 ??

British motorcycles on eBay
grumps65 #902884 02/14/23 10:00 pm
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 153
Likes: 12
Britbike forum member
Offline
Britbike forum member
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 153
Likes: 12
I take it that you mean the lightened crank with the scalloped flywheel. My 1972 NOS A65 crank is bob on 10kg. I'm thinking of putting it into my 71 Firebird with the full width flywheel.

Does anybody know if there's any significant improvement with the lighter crank and what the weight of the earlier 1970s crank is?

[Linked Image from i.postimg.cc]


1957 BSA A10 Spitfire
1971 BSA A65 Firebird
1971 BSA A70 Lightning
1975 Norton Commando
1961 Norton 99
grumps65 #902891 02/14/23 10:33 pm
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 2,567
Likes: 497
Britbike forum member
Offline
Britbike forum member
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 2,567
Likes: 497
The object was to improve balance but it makes little if any difference.
Some blokes ran the a50 flywheel and reckoned it was better, i tried it
and once again noticed very little difference.

Last edited by NickL; 02/14/23 10:36 pm.
grumps65 #902940 02/15/23 10:07 am
Joined: Jun 2022
Posts: 26
Likes: 4
JJC Offline
Britbike forum member
Offline
Britbike forum member
Joined: Jun 2022
Posts: 26
Likes: 4
I had one of the lighter cranks in a late OIF Thunderbolt. Vibration was horrible. It was so bad it cracked the frame in several places including the seat support frame loop, the engine mounting bracket that is welded to the oil tank part of the frame, causing the oil tank to leak and the seams of the fuel tank split as well. When one of the conrods let go and destroyed the engine, I put in a replacement engine with a heavier crank which was much better. That was 30 years ago and I'm still using the bike and the welded up bits are still intact.

Joined: Oct 2020
Posts: 162
Likes: 8
Britbike forum member
Offline
Britbike forum member
Joined: Oct 2020
Posts: 162
Likes: 8
Here is the crank out of my '72 A65T with engine date code 'NG'. Very sharp machined edges on the scalloped flywheel.
The bathroom scale says 10.2kg. No idea of how accurate that is, but don't have anything else to use.

[Linked Image from i.ibb.co]
[Linked Image from i.ibb.co]

Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 5,733
Likes: 258
Britbike forum member
Offline
Britbike forum member
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 5,733
Likes: 258
JJC, your vibration was more likely due to bad balancing than lighter weight. If the balance were the same, the imbalance forces between the crank and rods/pistons would be the same. It would just allow the crank to spin up/down faster.
Dan Macias made a crank for the Triumph where the most of the flywheel weight was placed in the outside webs next to the bearings. It reduced the flex of the crank. Not too relevant here though since you are starting with a stock crank.

1 member likes this: Jason McElroy
DMadigan #902991 02/15/23 11:58 pm
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,083
Likes: 96
Britbike forum member
Offline
Britbike forum member
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,083
Likes: 96
Originally Posted by DMadigan
JJC, your vibration was more likely due to bad balancing than lighter weight. If the balance were the same, the imbalance forces between the crank and rods/pistons would be the same. It would just allow the crank to spin up/down faster.
Dan Macias made a crank for the Triumph where the most of the flywheel weight was placed in the outside webs next to the bearings. It reduced the flex of the crank. Not too relevant here though since you are starting with a stock crank.


not saying u are wrong , just that i dont understand.

if u replace the (say) 70 crank with the full flywheel with one of the lighter ones in the pictures how come it doesnt bugger up the balancing ? My understanding is that balance is done with **% of the reciprocating weight of rods pistons etc

please explain ?


"There's the way it ought to be and there's the way it is" (Sgt Barnes)
grumps65 #902993 02/16/23 12:14 am
Joined: Mar 2019
Posts: 9
Likes: 1
Britbike forum member
OP Offline
Britbike forum member
Joined: Mar 2019
Posts: 9
Likes: 1
Appreciate all the response. I agree with Dmadigan in regard to JJC issues with excessive vibration. The light weight crankshafts we used in the Routt 750 long rod and 825 short rod Triumph motors was not an issue. Careful blanching is part of the solution. A big part.
In any event, thanks for the responses. And yes, I and a close friend are going to run light crankshafts in our A65s.I'll try to keep y'all informed on how it all works out

Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 5,733
Likes: 258
Britbike forum member
Offline
Britbike forum member
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 5,733
Likes: 258
What I meant was replacing a heavy crank with a light one with the same balance factor will not make a difference in the vibration. Just changing cranks without rebalancing will likely always end up with more vibration.

1 member likes this: grumps65
Joined: Jun 2022
Posts: 26
Likes: 4
JJC Offline
Britbike forum member
Offline
Britbike forum member
Joined: Jun 2022
Posts: 26
Likes: 4
Knowing the long-term history of the bike and having owned it since it had low mileage, I am confident the engine left the factory as I received it. That is, with the lightweight crank and very bad vibes.

Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,083
Likes: 96
Britbike forum member
Offline
Britbike forum member
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,083
Likes: 96
Originally Posted by DMadigan
What I meant was replacing a heavy crank with a light one with the same balance factor will not make a difference in the vibration. Just changing cranks without rebalancing will likely always end up with more vibration.

got it


"There's the way it ought to be and there's the way it is" (Sgt Barnes)
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 11,867
Likes: 345
Britbike forum member
Offline
Britbike forum member
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 11,867
Likes: 345
The factory only worked to a static balance % which directed the vibration in a direction in the vertical plane to suit the frame harmonics and the expected revs of a road bike. What they left untouched was the side to side balance which is eliminated by doing a dynamic balance, you can be lucky and get a crank close to a good dynamic balance with low vibes or bad bad one and get lots of vibes.

So get your crank dynamically balanced, you will need to send out your rods, pistons etc out so their weight can be included and they should also be weighed and made matching in weight left to right. The balancers first task will be check the static balance and correct any errors before moving on to the dynamic balance.

grumps65 #903397 02/20/23 11:14 pm
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 2,567
Likes: 497
Britbike forum member
Offline
Britbike forum member
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 2,567
Likes: 497
There was a rumour that the late type a65 cranks were dynamically balanced,
but i think that was cobblers myself. I statically balanced my one and
it's not bad, better in fact than some i've ridden with dynamically balanced
cranks, worse than some others, that's how it goes. It's a vertical twin with a
central flywheel, it's going to vibrate, they all do. If you get a bloke who is
prepared to do the balancing properly and gets it right, you should get sweet
spots you can ride in, that's the best you can hope for.


Moderated by  Allan G, Jon W. Whitley 

Link Copied to Clipboard
British Cycle SupplyMorries PlaceKlempf British PartsBSA Unit SinglesPodtronicVintage MagazineBritBike SponsorBritish Tools & FastenersBritBike Sponsor






© 1996-2023 britbike.com
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5