Britbike forum Forums British Motorcycle specific Brands Bsa bulletin board A65 Rods For Triumph?

I have just acquired a pair of conrods 67-270. I am led to believe these can be used on Triumph 650, which is what I would like to do. Aside from the small end bush which could be made, are there big end shells suitable? This may have been covered previously I would guess....

You can buy steel rods from MAP to suit your motor the exchange rate is not favorable but they do not fatigue and they are not expensive for their quality. A65's have a larger diameter crank pin and it's narrower. Rods are 6" same length as a T140 not a 650 which are longer. A65 rods work in neither.

These rods are definately 6 1/2" centres, are they A10 not A65?

A10 rods are 6.5 inch centres, the big end pin will either be too big if they are late a10 type
or too small if they are early a10 type. Both have 0.75 inch small ends.
I suppose you could have the early type sized for a trumpet but it's a questionable thing........

I've seen people do horrible things like putting two sets of shells in rods before.
Running one set inside the other, not very elegant or kosher really.

A65 rods are 6 inch centres.

I spoke with a friend who says he did it with .30 oversize bearing shells and found a suitable small end bush locally. I haven't double checked the measurements as yet but if he says he has done it then I know he has.

Far as I know, the A10 rod is .031 shorter than Triumph 650..

A10 and the triumph 650 both use 6.5 inch centres.
A65 is 6 inch centres.

TC
If your mate has done it i don't dispute it.
I've put BMC Mini rods on a norton crank before now.
Loads of things are possible just time and agro sorting.

Bearings in my A65 883 are .050" under mini. But acl stopped making them. And I cannot find any. Plus those rods are alloy. It's just complicated to run a bigger engine when smaller configurations deliver so well.

Not to start an arguement with Nick who knows way more about this than me...but.this is one of the few things I think I know.
The photo shows my A10 crank fitted with R&R rods.. They are based on their 650 Triumph rod with the ends resized for the A10. They are advertised as 6.5 centers and were by my measurements... Pushing a piston pin through the both a R&R and stock larger journal A10 rod, the .031 length difference was obivious.. Thunder Engineering told me their rods were the stock length not Triumph length..

Just measured my A10 Thunder rods and I can confirm what you say. Should anyone want a pair of new, unused rods... I doubt I will be using these any time soon.

Blimey, MAP better get some new rods then, so had Harris.
They both spec 6.5 centres for t120 and a10

750 trumpets used 6 inch as did a65/70 (they were the same forging.)

The likelihood of me ever needing to know t120 rod centres again is pretty low,
so i don't want to argue about this trivia.

You could just have the crank ground to a65 sizes then you could use 6 inch centre rods.
You are close to that anyway with -050 big ends. If the grinder is friendly, have him grind it
so you have a 90mm stroke. I did that with a standrad norton crank and carrillo's, just made
it +0.030 under.

My neighbour runs an engineering shop and he is going to bore them to fit the Triumph shells. Just need to find the big end diameter. UPDATE - its 1.77"

I was under the belief that triumph big ends were smaller than late A10/A65 motors. Is this 1.77” the big end size in the rod or the journal itself?

Standard A65 big end is 1.687” the big end size of the rod should be 1.844” (without shells fitted)

I should clarify that these are small journal A10 rods, not A65 as I originally thought..... 1.77" is the diameter of the Triumph rod big end, not the journal.