kevinā¦..I went with the VW bit because thatās what other rig owners recommended. My first real trip (500+ miles) I got a wheel wobble leaving a gas stopā¦ā¦.first time it had happened and boy oh boy was that a surprise. 0 to maybe 15 mph and I was struggling to hold on. It smoothed out but I had to find a way to keep that from happening again. Asked around and came up with the VW dampener. Hadnāt had the wobble since ( only experienced it that one timeā¦but that was enough)
BUTā¦ā¦.that unit you pictured looks like a trickā¦.Iām going to lust after something like thatā¦.itās a curse and this time aroundā¦.your fault
Last edited by Gordon Gray; 09/20/224:04 pm.
Gordon Gray in NC, USA........"Trees are for traction"
Fist of all can I say that I admire people that go for the uncoventional ie fitting a sidecar to a bike that BSA never really intended to have one.But now that your project seems to be nearing completion you should may be start thinking about the handling of an outfit like yours, reading your first post you say that you are going to use it for your campnig adventures. So I assume that you are going to use the sidecar to carry your camping gear, if that is so then you need to realise that sidecars were designed to carry people and there will be a significant difference in weight between an adult in the sidecar and camping gear. This will have an effect on the handling over there in the USA your sidecar is going to be on the right hand side of the bike so going round right hand corners you will have to be careful that the sidecar wheel does not leave the ground otherwise you will lose complete control of the outfit. I am speaking from experience having in the past had a few scary moments when adjusting from riding solo to a combination. The previous post said that you do not need a steering damper well back in the day when I rode a few combinations one of the first things you did when fitting a sidecar was to tighten the steering damper you needed much stiffer steering than a solo machine to counteract steering wobble.
photobobā¦. kevin dug up an old thread of mine. This thread started back in February of 2010.
The rig did around 4000 miles before I took it down for an engine rebuild. ( long story)
Today itās waiting on an engine from Ed V. Itās engine is on the bench and is too pretty to put back in the bike ( told you it was a long story). I have upgraded the front end and now have a TLS brake up front.
You have never camped with meā¦ā¦we could change that? I carry a LOT of gear and youād be surprised how much the kitchen sink weights. I didnāt have any problem with ballast. Even when I wasnāt camping I carry enough tools and spares that no extra weight was needed.
My experience is the same as yours when it comes to a steering dampener. I only experienced wheel wobble ( at very low speed) once but adding the dampener was a big plus on how the rig āfeltā going down the road. To date no more wobble.
Last edited by Gordon Gray; 09/20/224:07 pm.
Gordon Gray in NC, USA........"Trees are for traction"
Yes-- tighten the steering damper down hard. If you then get a steering shake-- a bit like a tank slapper on a solo then accelerate--that gets rid of it.
Yes-- tighten the steering damper down hard. If you then get a steering shake-- a bit like a tank slapper on a solo then accelerate--that gets rid of it.
I realize weāre talking about two different things?
Adjustable steering dampener vs a dampening strut?
My B44 didnāt come with a steering dampener. I added a dampening strut to stiffen up the steeringā¦ā¦..so maybe they are doing the same job? Iāve never had a bike ( that I remember?) that had an adjustable steering dampener.
The wobble I experienced was on start up and like Tridentman saidā¦ā¦increasing speed smoothed it out. I believe if it would have happened at 50-60 mph I might not be here typing.
Last edited by Gordon Gray; 09/20/225:35 pm.
Gordon Gray in NC, USA........"Trees are for traction"
dammit, ive been trying to put these pictures up for thirty minutes. slow-fi tonight
im not concerned about setup. you learn as much as you can, put it on, mess with it, learn more.
this indian one is in texas, just a no-frills tub with simple four-point frame mount, no fancy stuff, but looks like it could easily be adapted to a subframe. 20-gauge sheet metal, not fibreglas.
frame is just a rectangle , swingarm has a vertical pillar to mount the upper end of the shock.
current price is US$2200, including shipping and universal mounts
my kids race a 250 ninja that has a tendency to wobble. even with a straight chassis, correctly loaded steering head bearings , no odd weights, it will shake its head gently at 40mph and oscillate to a tank slapper if not restrained. a single fingertip on the bars will prevent the wobble.
the little ninjas are famous for this. the only cure for mine is a new front tire, no matter how much rubber is left to go. i get about 1000 to 1500 miles before the wobble reappears. il experiment with dampers eventually, but for the moment i just tell the kids to keep their hands on the bars.
i use dampers on whatever i race as well. sometimes the rules require them. i fell down at 115mph once on my bonneville because of a wobble, so i take them seriously.
Pureblood wrote āHeres a video showing the sidecar I was talking about. He needs to start all over again with fixing it to his bike. I would not take that out on the road.
ā
Photographic proofā¦ā¦..itās not as easy as one might think. or at least as some might think
My guess is that thing will go down the roadā¦ā¦but his mounts are an absolute mess IMO. He starts out with his front lower looking okayā¦then it all goes to hell Butā¦..he thinks itās good enough to actually document itā¦..kinda reminds me of a build thread on here recently.
Last edited by Gordon Gray; 09/21/223:47 pm.
Gordon Gray in NC, USA........"Trees are for traction"
Photographic proofā¦ā¦..itās not as easy as one might think. or at least as some might think
My guess is that thing will go down the roadā¦ā¦but his mounts are an absolute mess IMO. He starts out with his front lower looking okayā¦then it all goes to hell Butā¦..he thinks itās good enough to actually document itā¦..kinda reminds me of a build thread on here lately.
The upright connection thing looks familiar.
Where he has a universal mount standing upright? Very clever.
To quote the builder āIts quite a jobā
More likeā¦ā¦..ā I started off with the front lower strut mount on the opposite side of the bikeā¦ā¦by the time I got over to the chair sideā¦..the mushrooms started kicking inā
Last edited by Gordon Gray; 09/21/223:52 pm.
Gordon Gray in NC, USA........"Trees are for traction"
so im ignorant. i see 90 degree mounts rather than straight runs. i see pretty thin metal brackets being used to attach struts.
what else should i be seeing here? aside from the fact that his welding is as bad as mine? maybe worse?
nice sidecar body, though. i have read that inder sidecars are a step up in quality from cozy. either seem better built than the no-name one i bave pictured above. js that the case?
Go back to purebloodās photo of the bottom side of his Harley rig. (one of his other threads) His two lower struts are parallel to each other and level. IMO this is ideal. You adjust the front strut for toe in/out.(the chair) With them parallel and level adjustments are a snap.
Now you go to the uppers.
The optimum location for the uppers IMO are to be angled away from their connection at the chairās frame. Angled up and outward. Picture a 45 degree knee brace. With universal mounts your choices of mount locations are limited to free space on the frameā¦..and thatās not always the ideal location.
You adjust the uppers for lean in/out. ( the bike not the chair) But be sure you recheck the lowers. You might have pulled/pushed them out of level. Following up with whatās been saidā¦.if you have to adjust a lotā¦..one or more of the other struts might need readjusting.
His J strut should be connected to that 1ā rodā¦..there should be no third front mountā¦ā¦.that thing is useless and canāt be adjusted.
The rear mounts??????? Lord hopefully youāre getting the picture.
The more I think about itā¦ā¦..the more I realize itās really NOT that difficult but you need to understand that the struts need to do a job and be able to be adjusted. If you put them in a cockeyed fashion they might not move the chair/bike the way you need them toā¦ā¦when trying to adjust them.
Seeā¦ā¦.a man sets just one rig up and he becomes an overnight expert!!!!!
Once you have it in front of youā¦ā¦.and figure out what each strutās job isā¦ā¦it starts to make sense.
God I should have never started this reply because I probably missed a lotā¦ā¦ but now Iām too stubborn to delete it.
Hopefully some of the REAL side car jockeys ( we know who are) will chime in and correct me if I got it wrong.
Last edited by Gordon Gray; 09/21/227:05 pm.
Gordon Gray in NC, USA........"Trees are for traction"
the sputnik looks like a velorex clone, and while it may be up to date, the appearance of both really doesnt do anythjing for me.
ive looked at inder and cozy sidecars for years. still looking at whats available. the ural/dnepr chairs come up on craigslist. they look pretty sturdy. dunno about the rear wheel lead on those tho
velorex mounts look better-engineered than any ive seen
im beginning to understand the geometry a bit better. the indian stuff all mounts to a single bar parallel to the bike frame, with only the front J-bar there to resist the sidecar folding up and in. velorex has a rigid subframe in ^^^this application, and then struts mounted higher up to triangulate the sidecar attachments.
Those photos of the mountsā¦ā¦a lot going on there. Absolutely three lower struts and it looks like a tube running up from the frame to the front upper strut????? Never saw that before but makes me feel better about my design.
I got mine in 2010 for $500. Passed on a couple before that for the same price. Iām thinking $1000-1500 now????? But you might do better you just might have to remove some awful painted lady with lions on a leash.
Thereās a member on hereā¦ā¦lives in Ohio that picked one (560) up at a OVBSAOC rally a few years back. Donāt think he got around to ever mounting it. I asked awhile back if heād sellā¦ā¦he said no back then. Want me to ask him again?
Gordon Gray in NC, USA........"Trees are for traction"
The Velorex was designed to be used on 250/350 cc bikes. So they are lightweight. Not something youād want to mount on a big bike IMO. But one of the nicest rigs Iāve seen was a KZ1000 Police with a 560ā¦just had the look.
If money was not factorā¦ā¦.. Iād love a Steib
Gordon Gray in NC, USA........"Trees are for traction"
[quote=kevin]velorex mounts look better-engineered than any ive seen
Other than these mounts are cool as hell and mine are cobbled together.
My rear upper strut is at the same angle as this front strut, but in the opposite direction. The universal clamps wouldnāt let me do that so I made something to connect to that was rearward of the shock mount.
Straight like the one in the photo is fine IMO but if you moved the top of the strut towards the front of the bikeā¦ā¦..thatās not good IMO
Last edited by Gordon Gray; 09/21/228:31 pm.
Gordon Gray in NC, USA........"Trees are for traction"