BritBike Forum logo
BritBike Sponsor BritBike Sponsor BritBike Sponsor
BritBike Sponsor

BritBike Sponsor

BritBike Sponsor
BritBike Sponsor BritBike Sponsor BritBike Sponsor
JWood Auction JRC Engineering dealers JWood Auction
Home | Sponsors, Newsletter | Regalia | Calendar | Bike Project | BritBike Museum | Spiders Cartoons, "OLD" BritBike Forum | DVD- Manuals & Parts books | BritBike Stickers & Decals
Upgrade to: Premium Membership | Premium Life Membership | Vendor Membership | Site Sponsor Membership
Photo posting tutorial

Member Spotlight
BritTwit
BritTwit
Kansas City area
Posts: 534
Joined: December 2005
Show All Member Profiles 
Shout Box
Search eBay for motorcycle parts in following countries
Australia, Canada, France, Holland, Italy, United Kingdom, USA
Random Gallery photo
Who's Online Now
200 registered members (1xfatboy), 1,877 guests, and 550 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newest Members
Doug Valley, tim_v7, BosBSA, Ron 1973 TR7RV, barnett468
10030 Registered Users
Top Posters(30 Days)
Lannis 146
Stuart 67
Popular Topics(Views)
475,652 mail-order LSR
Forum Statistics
Forums33
Topics65,697
Posts635,023
Members10,029
Most Online3,995
Feb 13th, 2017
Like BritBike.com on Facebook

Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
1972 T100 Con Rod question #720777
01/01/18 7:09 pm
01/01/18 7:09 pm
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 406
Central NJ
Vetterdog Online content OP
BritBike Forum member
Vetterdog  Online Content OP
BritBike Forum member
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 406
Central NJ
Rebuilding my top end (after incident I'd rather not talk about). I ruined one of my con rods, but have a set of slightly older ones. These have the brass small end bushings, while the originals do not, and are machined alloy at the small end. Is there any reason not to use the older ones? Thanks for any input!
-DV


vdog
66 6T
67 A65L
72 T100R
Support Your #1 BritBike Forum!
Membership Type! Free
Member
Premium
Member
Premium Life
Member
Vendor
Member
Site
Sponsor
Recognition No Premium Member Premium Life member (5 years) Vendor Member Site Sponsor Membership
Post commercial threads No No No Yes Yes
Custom title No Yes Yes Yes Yes
Upload avatar & photos No Yes Yes Yes Yes
Link avatar & photos Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Private Message Storage: 10 100 100 100 100
Length of signatures 255 600 600 600 600
Removes this very advert island between post 1&2 No Yes Yes Yes Yes
Price Free $12.90/year $105.00 No End
$55.00/5 years
$210.00/year
($17.50/month)
Email
Click on button >>
  Premium Member Premium Life member Vendor Member Site Sponsor Membership
Re: 1972 T100 Con Rod question [Re: Vetterdog] #720840
01/02/18 8:01 am
01/02/18 8:01 am
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,275
Nanaimo, B.C. Canada
W
Wilfred Offline
BritBike Forum member
Wilfred  Offline
BritBike Forum member
W
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,275
Nanaimo, B.C. Canada
Vetterdog

There will be other more informed than I but I have a 66 T100SC engine that came to me with later non bushed rods and even a roller bearing on the drive side so it would seem that there is a lot of interchangeability in these engines that could be possible. It also has the later oil pump and later cams as well so I would assume that it saw some serious duty in it's past. As I said, there will be more knowledgeable people that will chime in.

Cheers, Wilf


"It's about the ride..."
Re: 1972 T100 Con Rod question [Re: Vetterdog] #720843
01/02/18 8:54 am
01/02/18 8:54 am
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 593
Skudeneshavn Norway
S
Stein Roger Online content
BritBike Forum member
Stein Roger  Online Content
BritBike Forum member
S
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 593
Skudeneshavn Norway
I was waiting for John Healy to provide the definitive answer, but until then I'll offer my humble opinion... I have three different C series rods in my possession. They range from relatively slender to very sturdy, but keeping in mind that the early engines were tuned hard and finished, and won, a lot of races, including endurance events, I wouldn't worry about using any of them in a road engine. I'd use the older ones DV, unless they've been used for racing, are bent or oval, cracked etc.

Re: 1972 T100 Con Rod question [Re: Vetterdog] #720987
01/03/18 10:40 pm
01/03/18 10:40 pm
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 79
manchester england
W
wilksville Offline

BritBike Forum member
wilksville  Offline

BritBike Forum member
W
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 79
manchester england
Vetterdog, if it were my engine then it would be getting new rods.

regards Peter


'74 T140V,'83 XR1000, C&J FLATTRACKER T140,
Re: 1972 T100 Con Rod question [Re: Vetterdog] #721295
01/06/18 7:36 pm
01/06/18 7:36 pm
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 406
Central NJ
Vetterdog Online content OP
BritBike Forum member
Vetterdog  Online Content OP
BritBike Forum member
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 406
Central NJ
Thanks for the feedback fellas. The rods I have came from a good running motor, and I will be just buzzing around county roads, no hard running, those days are behind me. As I just got a replacement crankshaft in the mail today, I'm going to begin building this motor again. (Nobody local grinds cranks anymore!)


vdog
66 6T
67 A65L
72 T100R

Moderated by  John Healy 


Home | Sponsors | Newsletter | Regalia | Calendar | Bike Project | BritBike Museum | Spiders Cartoons | "OLD" BritBike Forum | DVD- Manuals & Parts books | BritBike Stickers & Decals
Upgrade to: Premium Membership | Premium Life Membership | Vendor Membership | Site Sponsor Membership
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.6.1.1