BritBike Forum logo
BritBike Sponsor BritBike Sponsor BritBike Sponsor
BritBike Sponsor

BritBike Sponsor

BritBike Sponsor
BritBike Sponsor BritBike Sponsor BritBike Sponsor
  JWood Auction  
Home | Sponsors, Newsletter | Regalia | Calendar | Bike Project | BritBike Museum | Spiders Cartoons, "OLD" BritBike Forum | DVD- Manuals & Parts books | BritBike Stickers & Decals
Upgrade to: Premium Membership | Premium Life Membership | Vendor Membership | Site Sponsor Membership
Photo posting tutorial

Member Spotlight
PBMW
PBMW
Bremerton, Washington, USA
Posts: 55
Joined: September 2007
Show All Member Profiles 
Shout Box
Search eBay for motorcycle parts in following countries
Australia, Canada, France, Holland, Italy, United Kingdom, USA
Random Gallery photo
Who's Online Now
210 registered members (Adam M.), 1,828 guests, and 547 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newest Members
Brian Ellery, Jon Andrews, Berni Ernst, johnguppy, michael morgan
9955 Registered Users
Top Posters(30 Days)
btour 188
koan58 100
Stuart 88
NickL 66
Popular Topics(Views)
437,093 mail-order LSR
Forum Statistics
Forums33
Topics65,270
Posts632,142
Members9,955
Most Online3,995
Feb 13th, 2017
Like BritBike.com on Facebook

Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate This Thread
#408044 - 12/10/11 12:44 pm '69 Lightning Fork Issues  
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 160
koncretekid Offline
BritBike Forum member
koncretekid  Offline
BritBike Forum member

Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 160
Nova Scotia, Canada
I'm in the process of restoring a basket case Lightning which is supposed to be 1969. However, the frame is '67, motor is '65, and front end is either '69 or '70. Assembling the forks to the frame, I found that there was no way to install the front wheel without compressing one of the forks slightly - - one appeared to be about 1/8" longer that the other. Upon dis-assembly, I found that the machining of the bottom of the fork tubes to be grossly different. (note:there is a posting on the Triumph Forum under (Front wheel - Fork alignment issue) which shows the same problem.)

The difference is about 1/8" of an inch. Also, the axle slot was out of square with the tube by about 1/4" in 10".

Was BSA really this bad at quality control? Or is one of these from a different model? I searched thru about 50 sets of used BSA fork tubes at British Cycle Supply, and actually found one exactly like the longer one shown here, including the dimple next to the axle slot, but I couldn't find the mate to it. I picked up a good useable one (on the left) but of course it would have to be powder coated. So I decided to machine them. First I squared up the slot on the shorter one, then I milled about an 1/8" off the longer one and deepened the slot.

the last photo shows the end result.

I will have to get another end cap powder coated, but that can be add at any time.
Can anybody shed light on the small dimples shown on both the fork leg and the cap? Are Triumph, '69 and '70, the same?
Tom


Last edited by koncretekid; 12/10/11 12:47 pm.

Life's uncertain - go fast now!
Support Your #1 BritBike Forum!
Membership Type! Free
Member
Premium
Member
Premium Life
Member
Vendor
Member
Site
Sponsor
Recognition No Premium Member Premium Life member (5 years) Vendor Member Site Sponsor Membership
Post commercial threads No No No Yes Yes
Custom title No Yes Yes Yes Yes
Upload avatar & photos No Yes Yes Yes Yes
Link avatar & photos Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Private Message Storage: 10 100 100 100 100
Length of signatures 255 600 600 600 600
Removes this very advert island between post 1&2 No Yes Yes Yes Yes
Price Free $12.90/year $105.00 No End
$55.00/5 years
$210.00/year
($17.50/month)
Email
Click on button >>
  Premium Member Premium Life member Vendor Member Site Sponsor Membership
#408046 - 12/10/11 1:05 pm Re: '69 Lightning Fork Issues [Re: koncretekid]  
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 588
Bola Offline
BritBike Forum member
Bola  Offline
BritBike Forum member

Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 588
Toronto, Canada
My problem exactly.

You've got missed-matched parts there. Fortunately for me, I found a NOS right slider, and a used left that was a perfect match.

Things to look for... the threads that meet the seal holders should be the same on both legs (of equal length). The sliders themselves should be the same length - making all aspects equal on both sliders. (if lengths differ, the front wheel will fit cock-eyed on the axle) The dimples are only a cosmetic alignment indicator and not an issue. Some tubes had them, some didn't. The axle caps don't have to be the same width but are perhaps better to have the fat ones.

There seems to be quite a variety of fork sliders out there for the same year/s. I'm not sure why. It doesn't make sense. One thing to watch out for - be sure that the knobs that holds the front fender in place are located in exactly the same spot. Machining the fork 1/8" shorter may produce other issues.(eg. compromised thread depth in the bottom of the slider, and a difference in placement for the front fender)

The front fork assembly in both manuals are the same for 69/70 as far as I can tell.

Good luck with this konkrete. It can be maddening!

Last edited by Bola; 12/10/11 1:59 pm.
#408149 - 12/11/11 1:03 am Re: '69 Lightning Fork Issues [Re: koncretekid]  
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 9,295
Stuart Online content
BritBike Forum member
Stuart  Online Content
BritBike Forum member

Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 9,295
Scotland
Hi Tom,

Various threads on this subject have aired on both the Triumph and BSA Boards in the last few months; while all the definitive answers haven't emerged, this much has:-

. '68, '69 and '70 BSA twin forks incorporate some of the contemporary Triumph bits, but some are peculiar to the Beezas. The BSA top yoke is the same pre-'68 one, and the Triumph tls brakes from each year are used complete, including the shorter axle in '68; most differences are in the sliders, which are not only unique to the Beeza twins but different in each of the three seasons. cry

. In '69 and '70, the Beeza twins used the same stanchions as the B25 singles, which are the same as the Triumph T25 singles. They aren't the same as the stanchions used on the Triumph twins or Trident and Rocket 3 triples. However, because all '69 and '70 stanchions and sliders are different lengths, the stanchions used on BSA twins are also unique to each year. cry

Hth.

Regards,

#408181 - 12/11/11 6:54 am Re: '69 Lightning Fork Issues [Re: koncretekid]  
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 269
EWebster Offline
BritBike Forum member
EWebster  Offline
BritBike Forum member

Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 269
Quote:
The dimples are only a cosmetic alignment indicator and not an issue.


You sound quite confident of this! The photo with the tri square.....why not put a protractor head on it and measure the angle?

#408221 - 12/11/11 1:20 pm Re: '69 Lightning Fork Issues [Re: koncretekid]  
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 160
koncretekid Offline
BritBike Forum member
koncretekid  Offline
BritBike Forum member

Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 160
Nova Scotia, Canada
Tri-square to measure the angle would have been interesting, especially if I could have complained to my local BSA dealer and insisted on warranty! In my case, I only needed to know that it was not square and needed to be fixed.
Tom


Life's uncertain - go fast now!
#408237 - 12/11/11 4:39 pm Re: '69 Lightning Fork Issues [Re: koncretekid]  
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 269
EWebster Offline
BritBike Forum member
EWebster  Offline
BritBike Forum member

Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 269
You are assuming the angle is not intentional.

#408449 - 12/13/11 1:03 am Re: '69 Lightning Fork Issues [Re: koncretekid]  
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 541
Ed V Offline
Sponsor Member
Ed V  Offline

Sponsor Member

Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 541
Howard City, MI
Tom
When we run across this which is quite common we grab a Triumph lower leg and use it in place of the longer BSA one problem cured

#408494 - 12/13/11 11:51 am Re: '69 Lightning Fork Issues [Re: Ed V]  
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 160
koncretekid Offline
BritBike Forum member
koncretekid  Offline
BritBike Forum member

Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 160
Nova Scotia, Canada
Ed,
I guess I should have looked thru British Cycle's box of used Triumph fork legs but I didn't think of that. In any case, the hole being bored out of square had to be corrected, so I solved the problem.
Tom


Life's uncertain - go fast now!

Moderated by  Allan Gill, Jon W. Whitley 


Home | Sponsors | Newsletter | Regalia | Calendar | Bike Project | BritBike Museum | Spiders Cartoons | "OLD" BritBike Forum | DVD- Manuals & Parts books | BritBike Stickers & Decals
Upgrade to: Premium Membership | Premium Life Membership | Vendor Membership | Site Sponsor Membership
UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.6.0
Page Time: 0.202s Queries: 15 (0.063s) Memory: 0.8442 MB (Peak: 1.0189 MB) Zlib disabled. Server Time: 2017-11-21 08:10:44 UTC